Should Dates be included on Non-vintage Champagne?
Champagne, Spirits and Liqueur reviews
Champagne, Spirits and Liqueur Reviews
Champagne Tuesdays - Wine Events, Consultancy, Tutoring, Journalism
Wine Events, Consultancy, Tutoring, Journalism

The Wine Community
Discussion Forums

The Wine Community Forums
Home   
Search
    Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
     
Recent Posts
   
Popular Topics

Home » Champagne & Sparkling Wine » Champagne by Type » Non-vintage Champagne » Should Dates be included on Non-vintage...

Should Dates be included on Non-vintage... Expand / Collapse
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Should Dates be included on Non-vintage...
Poll ResultsVotes
No dates (current standard)
0%
0
Should have Bottling Date
  		33.33%
2
Should have Corking (Disgorgement) Date
  		33.33%
2
Should have the vintage years used
  		16.67%
1
Should have percentages of the vintage years used
  		16.67%
1
Member Votes: 0, Anonymous Votes: 6. You don't have permission to vote within this poll.
Author
Message
Jeremy Hopkin
Posted 02/02/2006 20:04:36


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Administrators
Last Login: 19/05/2008 13:33:52
Posts: 129, Visits: 314
The flavour of champagne changes overtime, yet there is no indication of how young or old a bottle is at purchase. Should this be included?

For example, Charles Heidsieck now includes "Mis En Cave", or their bottling date.

Jeremy Hopkin
Libation U.N. Limited
www.libation-unlimited.com
Post #11
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


Reading This Topic Expand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
Forum Moderators: Jeremy Hopkin, Chris Hambleton

All times are GMT, Time now is 7:22pm

Libation U.N. Limited - Champagne, Spirits and Liqueur Reviews
Execution: 0.844. 17 queries. Compression Disabled.